Danger fully : the guarantor.

Method of preventing dispute

The prevention of the dispute concerning the boundary basically returns to one point. It is to remove the vagueness of the boundary.

I think that it can understand it is vague from the starting point about the boundary even if it does from the meaning of a public chart.

When such vagueness thinks about the boundary of the characteristic, it can be said as being nature of it that the boundary is a cause of the dispute and the trouble.

It hears it from parents, and the variable might be a strong, and it be mere conviction only of my conviction to the boundary as the vender undertook the explanation like that as the desire somehow that the boundary is this.

This invents the difference of recognition with neighbors.

Therefore, it is necessary to set up a clear boundary signpost objectively after the adjoining land owner attends mutually and it confirms it.

Finally, I think it is good when the lawsuit of the boundary fixation is done and it fixes the boundary so that there is worry in which the dispute will happen in the future because of course, it is not it is possible to hold this because the boundary is publicly decided there.

I think that it only has to decide the boundary of the meaning of private as long as it wants to do neither the neighboring house nor the lawsuit because of the discussion and attendance. It is not insisted it is useless, and because it acts by assumption that it is a field of ..third party.. Sacai, and it settles down the situation, I think an actual effect ..on.. to be enough ..that much.. however mutually.

(AA)境界をめぐるトラブル解決法―この一冊で・あなたの土地の境界は守れる!

(AA)境界の法律紛争―円満解決のアドバイス

(AA)地代家賃・権利金・敷金 保証金・承諾料 更新料・立退料