Danger fully : the guarantor.
Before it stands surety
- What is the guarantor?
- Guarantor and cosigner
- Knowledge acquisition with Q&A
- Knowledge acquisition 2 with Q&A
- Knowledge acquisition 3 with Q&A
After it stands surety
Guarantor trouble prevention
- It is the advantage none in guarantor.
- How to refuse guarantor
- Guarantor degree check
- Attention rousing purple willow
Familiar trouble(boundary)
Familiar trouble(region)
- lding and construction
- Private road and traffic on the next ground
- Sunshiny and view
- Noise and stink
Knowledge of trouble solution
Others
Related link
- Name detective mass
- Person search of first love me who searches
- Basic knowledge of register and resident's card
- Measures laboratory of crank call
- Danger fully : the guarantor.
- Trouble links
Meaning of metes and bounds
The dispute in metes and bounds with neighbors is troubles as familiar as guarantor's problem. I want to explain the boundary trouble here.
Under such a condition, it is not suitable because it has a big extension and land is connected when targeting it in the right of the property right etc.Then, it will be necessary to divide it artificially to target it in the right.
Then, the verge ,in a word, the boundary between land divided will be caused.
There are two meanings about land in case of the boundary. One is a boundary in the public law, and another one is a boundary in the private law.
The boundary in the public law means the verge in land that especially does the brush (one that is fixed the lot number by units of the number of land in the land recording list and was divided) and is adjacent.
For instance, the verge of land and the first a chome in the ** town land secondarily a chome in the ** town is somewhere.
In this case, it doesn't relate who the owner of each land is. Therefore, the boundary in this meaning is the one that only the country is decided, it is objectively decided from the beginning on the character, and not one decided by the related person concerned's mutual agreement.
In a word, it did not provide the boundary in the public law even though it made an agreement for the line over which it did not fight with the verge of the lot number among adjacent land owners who had the direct interest very.
And, if the fight of the boundary in this public law is caused, it will solve it by instituting the appeal for the boundary fixation to request the fixation from the court, and requesting the judgment.
The verge in the private law is a problem within the range of the property in land, and the verge of the property right of adjoining land is meant for this.
There is no problem if the boundary in the public law is corresponding to the boundary in the private law, and a lot, and the trouble is variously current state therefore, except for no agreement.